"Across the Ocean, their Genocide Endures"
This past Sunday, with my colleagues from UUSC, and among a large group of Darfur activists, I attended Boston’s Global Day for Darfur rally on Boston Common. Similar events were organized in numerous cities.
What struck me most was that, in my view of the gathered crowd, it seemed like this movement to end the genocide in Darfur is taking a strong hold among youth and young adults. Rebecca Hamilton, a third-year law student, and one of the founders of Genocide Intervention Network, spoke from the podium with conviction beyond her years and energized the crowd for action.
Ben Crair from Slate wrote about the rally taking place in Philadelphia: “Oncoming traffic slowed to observe the human mass, which radiated with drumbeats, a ship of noise floating down a concrete canyon. The drummers, African-American teenagers from the Mount Airy Church of God in Christ, followed the leaders, quaking the pavement with their rhythms and trailing a hodgepodge of Americans, Darfurians, and Sudanese.”
But, as he goes on to note, what we do each following day with the energy gained from rallies like these will make the difference.
“As the drumbeats dissipated, the circle unraveled, and people began heading home. The Darfurians looked happy to be united for a few hours on a quiet Sunday with a city that on the following day would resume its routines. Across the ocean, their genocide endures.”
Labels: Darfur

1 Comments:
The rebels from Darfur, who initiated armed action against the Sudanese military base in their region, were attempting to wrest power from the government for the benefit of Darfur, not Sudan. Do subsequent wrongs by the government military and subcontract militias make the rebels original hostilities right?
If the solution to internal power struggles is political, not military, how does the anti-genocide movement figure into resolution of the internal power struggle, which we can assume will continue through the current domestic and international regimes?
Would not an international focus on prosecution of war crimes and a sharp reduction in arms dealing ultimatel alleviate pressure on the victims of Darfur? Yet what we see in the anti-genocide movement for Darfur resembles an adhoc hate movement directed at the current pan-Arabist military regime controlling the nation. Further the U.S. cooperates with this regime as part of its "Global War on Terror" (GWOT). How does an anti-Bashir regime policy advance the GWOT? Is the government's war on Darfur not essentially terrorist?
How do political rallies staged by well-meaning U.S. rights groups improve the enforcement of internatonal law (governing war crimes), or facilitate the delivery of services within Darfur?
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Post a Comment
<< Home