What Are Women Worth?
In the wake of International Women's Day 2008, I learned through news stories around the United States that as a high-end prostitute, I could make $5,500 an hour. So, I did the math. For one day as a high-end prostitute, just one day, just 8 hours, I could actually make more money than I will this entire year at my job – a job I love. As a woman, knowing that my value, as society would have it, lies in my body ... Well, that’s a hard pill to swallow.
I’ve heard the arguments before – the arguments that say, “Who is using who here?” and “Those wily women are the ones using the system – look at how much money they're making!” Yes, they're making a lot of money – tons, in fact. Say they decided to work one day a week for the entire year – just one day a week, at 44,000 a day – well, they would cash in at $2,228,000 for a year's work. Not a bad sum of money for working one day a week, I admit.
But here is the thing. What that says to women, all women, is that the most valuable thing they can do, the thing that is worth the most – is their body. The same holds true for strippers. They are not the ones that hold the cards – they are participating in a society-wide presumption that ultimately values their body far more than their mind. And that is extremely problematic. Every time an intelligent woman makes the choice to strip, or to escort, or to prostitute herself, she is reinforcing society’s decision to value her body above all other things. She is making it harder for women like me, women who could choose the route of a body-for-money trade, but who fight that choice, and the resulting social values it enforces.
And, there is more to this story, this story of women’s bodies.
A new phenomenon has emerged in recent months, a phenomenon that puts an alternative price on women’s bodies. It’s the outsourcing of birth, and, like prostitution, like stripping, it tells women that their ultimate worth lies in their bodies. But it goes one step further – it tells some women, like the women in
Let’s do the math again. A high-end, western prostitute makes a little over $5,000 an hour. A low-end Indian surrogate, at $7,000 a pop, 9 months of full-time work, 24 hours a day (and, I think we can agree, pregnancy is full time) … that comes down to about $6.50 an hour.
So, what I’m learning, through the prices of prostitution and surrogacy, is not only do we value women for their bodies – we value some women’s bodies far more than others. If you are western, and cater to the New York governor, we will pay you! Your body is worth a lot! But, if you are Indian (sorry!), the best we can offer you is a 9-month minimum-wage job.
Is being paid to carry someone else’s baby the same as being paid to sleep with someone? Well, no … But both acts turn the women in either situation into little more than a physical entity. And that’s the problematic thing.
It’s tragic, what we are saying to women, not just here, but all over the world. All financial arguments fall flat in the face of the larger societal impact – the one that tells women that their value, their ultimate worth, lies in their ability to bodily and sexually serve society. So the question, at least for me, is, how do we create the shift to a society where the mind matters more than the chromosome?
Labels: International Women's Day

4 Comments:
Whilst there are people who have money and wish to pay for physical services and whilst there are people with bodies who are prepared to accept pay for providing such services such transactions will occur.
What your post illustrates, more than anything else, is an enormous disparity in gendered wealth, the disparity of wealth between nations etc.
Such a disparities have a variety of reasons, including available capital, including personal ability, but perhaps most of all, the institutional capacity for individuals to control their own bodies and their own life.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
I see what you're saying, but the fact is that most Western prostitutes do /not/ make 5K an hour. How would that fit into your argument?
In addition, I find this statement extremely problematic:
She is making it harder for women like me, women who could choose the route of a body-for-money trade, but who fight that choice, and the resulting social values it enforces.
I hardly think that for a woman who makes a living as a prostitute the choice is between selling her body or working for a human rights organization. Do you really mean this to sound as judgmental as it does?
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Hi Anonymous,
Yes, I see your point -- most prostitutes won't make 5k an hour. My simple answer to that is, it doesn't matter what they make - putting a monetary value on any woman's body is problematic.
As to your second point - Yes, I agree - Most women who enter prostitution do not do so because it seems like the best career. Statistically, most have been sexually abused or attacked, and I do not take this lightly - You are right, for many of these women, it probably does not seem like much of a choice, if any. You are also right, in that, I had many more choices than most of these women probably do.
The problem, for me, lies in the fact that society tells these women that selling their bodies is more profitable than other things they could do - And, again, you are right in the fact that its probably not the women I should judge - its the underlying social values that are problematic. However, I do believe that women who do enter prostitution (or stripping), bolster those values by participating in them.
But I see your points.
Monday, March 17, 2008
financial arguments fall flat in the face of the larger societal impact – the one that tells women that their value, their ultimate worth, lies in their ability to bodily and sexually serve society.
While it was right around International Womens Day & your examples were both women, I think it is worthwhile to point out that sex workers are not solely women, and thus many people are being told that their value lies in their ability to bodily & sexually service another regardless of gender.
Indeed, not to channel Marx without dilution, but the state of migrant farm workers both here in the United States or abroad (the cocoa fields of Africa spring to mind) are clear examples of how dominant society values many people only for how they can physically service its needs & desires, rather then as individuals.
Corporate jargon frankly describes workers as assets, an appraisal that we are encouraged to internalise. The sexual element of this labour is an issue laid upon a framework that is already deeply dismissive of any individual's inherent worth and dignity- what's your job and who you are are already seen as synonymous questions.
Thursday, April 03, 2008
Post a Comment
<< Home