Home
UUSC

Truth, Justice, and the American Way for the Lower Manhattan Mosque?

In the days since UUSC posted its statement of support for New York City Mayor Bloomberg and the unanimous vote of the Landmarks Preservation Commission for the Cordoba House to move forward, we've had a lot of constructive dialogue with members who feel strongly either in equal amounts of support or opposition. The debate continues on our Facebook page and throughout the blogosphere and other news and opinion outlets.

I am proud to work for an organization that sees this issue for what it is: defending the rights that make up the fabric of our nation.

One of the arguments consistently made against the Cordoba House is that a majority of people are against a mosque at this particular spot. If we've learned anything from Judge Walker's recent ruling for gay rights in striking down Prop 8 and ensuring equality for LGBT Californians, it's that inherent rights should not be subject to a popular vote. Minorities must be afforded protection of the law, in effect to say, "We will not trample your rights simply because we do not believe as you do or practice as you do." If the Bill of Rights is our touchstone, then freedom of worship and freedom to assemble must not be undermined.

Another argument given: "This will open old wounds, so why does it have to be here of all places?" But if not here, then where is it acceptable? Should the Constitution now stipulate that freedom of religion is valid only in certain geographical places and available only to certain faiths? History is littered with examples of marginalized groups being ghettoized, restricted to their own corner of the world by those who hold power, which only leads to an "us" and "them" mentality — but never a "we." Until people's worldview of "there" becomes and includes "here too," we'll never reach the lofty goal we all repeated as schoolchildren: "one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." Surely there's a space for prayer and peace two blocks away from the former World Trade Center site.

What happens when we collectively buy into the divisiveness? Its ugliness spreads: mosques are protested, even violently, in Tennessee, California, Kentucky, WisconsinIllinois, and elsewhere. Stephen Salisbury, writing on Alternet, skillfully gets to the heart of the matter: "The mosque controversy is not really about a mosque at all; it's about the presence of Muslims in America, and the free-floating anxiety and fear that now dominate the nation's psyche." So we come to find that the xenophobic politicians who would exploit people's fears are the only terrorists to be found in this equation. And again, William Saletan echoes in Slate: "This is the real argument behind the campaign against the New York community center: It's Muslim, it's big, and it's too close to where a bunch of Muslims killed a bunch of us." Or in Newt Gingrich's words, there should be no mosque in lower Manhattan "so long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia." Again, it's us versus them, here and there.

Which brings us to Mayor Bloomberg's eloquent leadership, when he put on notice all those who would wrap themselves in the patriotic cloak of supporting 9/11 victims to justify their prejudice:

"On September 11, 2001, thousands of first responders heroically rushed to the scene and saved tens of thousands of lives. More than 400 of those first responders did not make it out alive. In rushing into those burning buildings, not one of them asked 'What God do you pray to?' 'What beliefs do you hold?' . . . We do not honor their lives by denying the very Constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor their lives by defending those rights — and the freedoms that the terrorists attacked."

And last, so that we can all take a breath and pause from all the contention — and since I am a huge comics geek — I'll add that even Superman, the symbol for "truth, justice, and the American way," shares this worldview: "It's only when over there becomes here that we can stop this once and for all."

Please join with UUSC, stand up for human rights, and let's build bridges so that "here" can come to meet, and include, "there."

Comments

Tom Kivisto

Truly fine content…The admin have a great information...I contribute to your skilled through.. I hope you post again soon. I am very pleased to leave a comment to this blog out there who put out really honest information. Tom Kivisto

Thanks

It was nearly a century and a half before we gave women the vote and began to understand gender equity. But, from our founding, freedom of religion has been part of our constitution. Our nation was not attacked by Islam on 911. It was attacked by men who happened to be Muslim and perverted the tenets of their religion to justify their political actions. I was a firefighter for 24 years. My colleagues who died on 911 were trying to save ALL the lives at risk in the World Trade Center. They were not trying to save only Christians, or only whites, or even just the native-born Americans. 

(To local Reverend) I just

(To local Reverend) I just read your call to action, and I know your heart is in the right place. However, the rather disjointed leadership of Islam continues to do little to address some significant problem areas. They have made a lukewarm disavowal of terrorism in the name of Allah; they condone the barbaric treatment of women in general, and most dangerous of all – their holy book treats Theocracy as quite normal. The idea of separation of church and state is not a priority with them. Also I have not heard of any Mullah or Imam forthrightly saying to his congregation that a martyr will not be met by 72 virgins, as so many seem to believe. Simply put, this is a barbaric set of beliefs in many ways, and does not deserve to be treated as sacrosanct. The Slate link below is to a very good article by the well-known Atheist, Christopher Hitchens. He makes very good points about other religious creeds, then towards the end he addresses Islam. I consider myself Agnostic, and am among a growing number who think free-thinkers cut true-believers too much slack. As a male, I am mystified and almost ashamed of feminists, who look the other way regarding Islamic treatment of females. There is no excuse for this, and the West should not acquiesce on such an important issue. Since I am not viewing this as a Christian with the Crusades in mind, I am not comfortable with the way the opposition is framing this whole Mosque thing. That said, I’m still not happy with allowing Muslims to form insular ghettos in the West, and in some cases to apply Sharia law. This is the 21st century, not the 9th. Sincerely, Jim Berry Even though he is fighting cancer, Hitchens maintains his great writing ability, and his razor-sharp logic. If only people would consider the points he makes ….. http://www.slate.com/id/2266154/?from=rss

Dare I hope that U.U.s will

Dare I hope that U.U.s will actually watch the video on this link, will do the research themselves, will develop increased knowledge that in supporting Cordoba house they are not supporting religious tolerance, but rather a political system that is very contrary to U.U. principles. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w&feature=player_embedded)

I also support the Cordoba

I also support the Cordoba House, at its proposed site, despite all the hype from Florida about canceling the Queran burnings on 9/11/2010 if the Imam in New York agrees to move this so-called "Mosque" away from Ground Zero. We UUs need to support interfaith respect for all religions, and speak out clearly about this respect, as UUSC and the UUA have done!

This is just one more

This is just one more example of why I am proud to be a UU. At a time when both Democrats and Republicans are shying away from standing up for our national values, it is great to see our denomination, once again, protecting religious freedom. Timothy McVeigh was raised a Roman Catholic. Would anyone seriously consider protesting the presence of St. Joseph's Old Cathedral across the street from the Oklahoma City National Memorial? Why, then would anyone question whether a mosque can be built two blocks away from the World Trade Center? It took a civil war before America began to acknowledge racial equality. It was nearly a century and a half before we gave women the vote and began to understand gender equity. But, from our founding, freedom of religion has been part of our constitution. Our nation was not attacked by Islam on 911. It was attacked by men who happened to be Muslim and perverted the tenets of their religion to justify their political actions. I was a firefighter for 24 years. My colleagues who died on 911 were trying to save ALL the lives at risk in the World Trade Center. They were not trying to save only Christians, or only whites, or even just the native-born Americans. In a city as cosmopolitan as New York, it is an embarrassment to their memory that we would selectively choose who is worthy of worshiping within a certain distance of their memorial.

I support the Cordoba House

I support the Cordoba House because I do not automatically equate the actions of the terrorists on 9/11 with authentic Islam. Therefore, an Islamic community center is not viewed any differently than an Evangelical Christian community center or a Shinto community center.

I support the Cordoba house.

I support the Cordoba house. I cannot think of one reason against it. We live in a country with freedom of religion. My brother died in the WTC on 9/11 and there were people of Muslim faith who died with him. Even if the proposed Islamic center were in the same building (which it is not), I would support their right to have a place to worship there as well.