UUSC stands in solidarity with the people of Kenya and Pakistan

UUSC condemns the mounting violence in Kenya and Pakistan and expresses deep concern for people there who are living in such intense insecurity. We express our sorrow for the innocent and vulnerable people in these countries who are trying to survive, but lack the resources to ensure their own safety. We also condemn the abuse of authority in both countries that led to the rigged election in Kenya and contributed to poor security in Pakistan, where the government’s failure to protect former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in the face of numerous threats led to her assassination.

As a human-rights organization, we stand in heartfelt solidarity with our Kenyan and Pakistani partners, whose courageous struggle for human rights has become even more precarious in the wake of flawed electoral processes and the resulting violence and unrest in both countries.

Despite their significant differences geopolitically and in other respects, Kenya and Pakistan share one key similarity today: both are important global actors in the United States-led “War on Terror.” The crises in Kenya and Pakistan also underscore the fact that political conflicts not only exacerbate but also result from weakened human–rights environments, and in both cases the “War On Terror” has had the effect of closing the legitimate space for the exercise of civil liberties. Where widespread violations of human rights occur — including not only violations of civil liberties, but also rights to just working conditions and wages; the right to sufficient, safe, accessible, and affordable water; and other rights particularly at risk in situations of natural disasters and human conflicts — the resulting economic, political, and social insecurity will often lead to civil unrest and violence.

We are now seeing this vicious cycle vividly at work in Kenya and Pakistan.

In each of these countries, the current violence has been precipitated by a lack of transparent and democratic electoral processes and public anger and frustration in turn. In both countries, the long-term manipulation of political and ethnic tensions has contributed to these crises.

In Kenya, a major humanitarian, political, and economic crisis looms unless both parties can achieve a just political agreement on the outcome of elections. The government committed serious abuses against fair electoral processes. According to a January 3 report in The Economist, the European Union electoral monitoring commission’s report was scathing, and E.U. monitors observed people crossing out vote tallies and writing in higher tallies for incumbent president Mwai Kibaki in Nairobi. After Kibaki was declared the victor, there were immediate protests, to which police responded with violence. According to the BBC, up to 600 Kenyans have been killed and over 250,000 displaced, with unrest continuing in parts of the country. Many people are unable to obtain their basic needs for food, shelter, and medical care. Millions of informal economy workers who survive on their day-to-day earnings are unable to work or provide for themselves and their families. People are wary of movement, families are separated, communication is scant, and many transportation routes have been closed.

Whole areas of Nairobi slums have been burned, destroying people’s homes and livelihoods, many in communities where our partners work. Women and girls are at particular risk for being targeted for violence, with at least one hospital in Nairobi reporting evidence of an increase in systematic gang rapes. In addition, the police have violently attacked and shot at peaceful protesters and failed to protect people who are poor and particularly vulnerable. Thousands of people are in shelters without adequate water, food, or sanitation.

In Pakistan, since September 2007, judges and lawyers have played an unprecedented role in calling for a free, fair, and legal election process. In retaliation, the government violently cracked down on protests, arresting and detaining hundreds of people and declaring martial law. The continuing popular protests and government crackdowns have revealed deep polarization among Pakistanis with different visions for the nation’s political and social future.

The extreme violence upon Bhutto’s return from self-imposed exile -- the suicide bombings that killed over 130 people at a November 2007 rally for her in Karachi and the numerous attempts on her life -- foreshadowed her assassination on December 27, 2007. These incidents revealed the intractable divisions that are triggering increased violence as much as they demonstrated Pakistan’s political volatility.

As a public figure, Bhutto’s record featured some controversies, including charges of corruption that marred her stints as prime minister. Nonetheless, Bhutto was a courageous and vocal female politician in a country where opportunities for women to participate in political processes, much less become political leaders, are very limited. Her voice has now been silenced through assassination.

Since Bhutto’s death, the unrest in major cities such as Karachi, Islamabad, and Lahore have made everyday life more difficult, as people’s food supplies run low, travel rendered unsafe, and access to basic services choked off. Rights organizations in Pakistan, including UUSC partners, continue to suffer harassment, arrests, and human-rights violations. Although elections have been postponed for a month, the current human-rights situation in Pakistan inspires little hope for just or fair elections.

Up until now, the U.S. government has engaged with these countries primarily in the context of its own military and economic interests. UUSC calls on the U.S. government to show real political will and support fair and just democratic solutions to the flaws that have marked both nations’ electoral processes. Furthermore, UUSC calls on the governments of Kenya and Pakistan to take the necessary steps to create conditions for free and fair elections -- a key component to building a more transparent, democratic society.